Services

Technology testing.

Experimental performance evaluation and benchmarking across technologies — under conditions representative of the industrial process.

Performance evaluation

Fresh and field-recovered material tested under the same protocol.

  • Standard characterisation

    Visual inspection, mechanical resistance, bulk density, loss on drying — included in every campaign.

  • Application-specific tests

    Saturation capacity, contamination assays, sorption isotherms — tailored to the contaminant and unit operation.

  • Fresh vs. spent comparison

    Side-by-side measurement of new and field-recovered material to quantify real in-service performances.

Application packages

Mercury removal

  • Saturation capacity
  • CVAAS analysis
  • Dynamic breakthrough

Sulfur removal

  • H₂S/COS capacity
  • Elemental analysis
  • COS formation risk

Chloride removal

  • HCl saturation (gas)
  • Organic chloride (liquid)
  • Guard-bed sizing

Dehydration

  • Water sorption isotherm
  • Hydrothermal aging
  • TSA cycle performance

Carbon dioxide

  • CO₂ isotherm
  • Competitive water adsorption
  • PSA and TSA aging

Hydrogen PSA

  • Multi-component isotherms
  • PSA cycling
  • H₂ recovery KPIs
Close-up of spent adsorbent beads showing fouling and structural change after service

Evolution testing

Durability and stability protocols that track how performance changes through service cycles, liquid exposure and thermal stress.

  • Liquids entrainment

    Mechanical integrity and capacity retention under liquid exposure — water, light and heavy hydrocarbons — replicating process upset conditions.

  • Hydrothermal aging

    Repeated regeneration cycles under controlled temperature and steam partial pressure — capacity loss quantified via sorption isotherms before and after.

  • Active phase stability

    Active phase retention and structural integrity through representative stress cycles — deactivation severity and remaining service life.

  • TSA/PSA cycling

    Multi-cycle performance under representative swing conditions — capacity, attrition, and fines generation measured before and after the campaign.

Benchmarking

Independent campaigns where the value comes from running the same protocol across multiple materials or technologies. Independence is the precondition that makes the comparison commercially usable.

  • Basket trials

    Comparative campaigns across multiple vendors — blind to the source, anonymised in the report, ranked by the same protocol applied to every sample.

  • Product qualification

    Formal validation campaigns for material manufacturers entering a new market — protocols matched to the target application, deliverable usable as supporting evidence in qualification submissions.

  • Technology development

    Selection studies for operators evaluating a new technology family — adsorption vs. catalysis vs. membranes vs. filtration compared head-to-head for a specific separation duty.

Activated carbon extrudates, one of the adsorbent materials evaluated in benchmarking campaigns

Why it matters

Numbers that survive contact with the unit.

Catalogue values come from idealised feed. Ours come from your feed, your cycles, your contaminants — measured fresh and after field service. That is the difference between data that wins a bid and data that holds up at the unit.

Go deeper

Where the methods and use cases live.

Have a material to evaluate?

Send us the scope, we'll come back with a test plan and timeline.